Xeon W3690 vs FX-8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.84
Xeon W3690
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.67
+21.6%

Xeon W3690 outperforms FX-8350 by a significant 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Xeon W3690 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13801211
Place by popularity95not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.940.96
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Gulftown (2010−2011)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$450
Current price$200 $572 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W3690 has 2% better value for money than FX-8350.

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Xeon W3690 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed4 GHz3.46 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.73 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C68 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Xeon W3690 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Xeon W3690. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

FX-8350 and Xeon W3690 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Xeon W3690 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Xeon W3690. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data24 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Xeon W3690.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8350 3.84
Xeon W3690 4.67
+21.6%

Xeon W3690 outperforms FX-8350 by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8350 5936
Xeon W3690 7231
+21.8%

Xeon W3690 outperforms FX-8350 by 22% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8350 489
Xeon W3690 558
+14.1%

Xeon W3690 outperforms FX-8350 by 14% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8350 1991
Xeon W3690 2644
+32.8%

Xeon W3690 outperforms FX-8350 by 33% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.84 4.67
Recency 23 October 2012 14 February 2011
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 130 Watt

The Xeon W3690 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Xeon W3690 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Xeon W3690, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
Intel Xeon W3690
Xeon W3690

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3394 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 290 votes

Rate Xeon W3690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or Xeon W3690, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.