Pentium 2117U vs i5-3439Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3439Y
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
1.20
+87.5%
Pentium 2117U
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.64

Core i5-3439Y outperforms Pentium 2117U by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23512768
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Pentium
Power efficiency8.743.56
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date8 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)67 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi++
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching+-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency850 MHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO++
CRT++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3439Y 1.20
+87.5%
Pentium 2117U 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3439Y 1907
+86.6%
Pentium 2117U 1022

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 0.64
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.77
Recency 8 January 2013 1 September 2012
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 17 Watt

i5-3439Y has a 87.5% higher aggregate performance score, 53.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 months, 100% more threads, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3439Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 2117U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3439Y and Pentium 2117U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3439Y
Core i5-3439Y
Intel Pentium 2117U
Pentium 2117U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Core i5-3439Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 190 votes

Rate Pentium 2117U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3439Y or Pentium 2117U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.