Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Core i5-3230M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i5-3230M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads
1.65
+73.7%

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19612381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)10 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$241
Current price$93 (0.4x MSRP)$106 (0.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCPGA988BGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3230M 1.65
+73.7%
Core 2 Duo T8300 0.95

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 74% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i5-3230M 2558
+73.8%
Core 2 Duo T8300 1472

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 74% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-3230M 510
+70%
Core 2 Duo T8300 300

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 70% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i5-3230M 1026
+118%
Core 2 Duo T8300 470

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 118% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i5-3230M 4268
+62.5%
Core 2 Duo T8300 2626

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 63% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-3230M 9159
+89.4%
Core 2 Duo T8300 4837

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 89% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i5-3230M 3760
+75.5%
Core 2 Duo T8300 2143

Core i5-3230M outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by 75% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 0.95
Recency 1 January 2013 10 January 2008
Threads 4 2
Cost $225 $241
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm

The Core i5-3230M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T8300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3230M and Core 2 Duo T8300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3230M
Core i5-3230M
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1004 votes

Rate Core i5-3230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 253 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3230M or Core 2 Duo T8300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.