Celeron J1800 vs i5-3230M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3230M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.61
+347%
Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36

Core i5-3230M outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 347% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21023051
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.353.41
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$72

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.58 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz792 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3230M 1.61
+347%
Celeron J1800 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3230M 2562
+346%
Celeron J1800 574

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.61 0.36
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.77
Recency 1 January 2013 1 November 2013
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

i5-3230M has a 347.2% higher aggregate performance score, 53.2% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3230M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3230M and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3230M
Core i5-3230M
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1118 votes

Rate Core i5-3230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 539 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3230M or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.