C-70 vs i5-2510E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2510E
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.19
+495%

Core i5-2510E outperforms C-70 by a whopping 495% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2510E and C-70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23593233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5AMD C-Series
Power efficiency3.202.09
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$266no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2510E and C-70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size149 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2510E and C-70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2510E and C-70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2510E and C-70 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2510E and C-70 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2510E and C-70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size16.6 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon HD 6290 (280 - 400 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2510E and C-70 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2510E and C-70.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2510E 1.19
+495%
C-70 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2510E 1889
+500%
C-70 315

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 0.20
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.27
Recency 1 February 2011 1 September 2012
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 9 Watt

i5-2510E has a 495% higher aggregate performance score, 144.4% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

C-70, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 288.9% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-2510E is our recommended choice as it beats the C-70 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2510E and C-70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2510E
Core i5-2510E
AMD C-70
C-70

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i5-2510E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 96 votes

Rate C-70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2510E or C-70, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.