Xeon 5148 vs i5-2400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-2400
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.53
+322%

Core i5-2400 outperforms Xeon 5148 by a whopping 322% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17532803
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.863.05
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore i5 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency2.431.37
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Woodcrest (2006)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)June 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60$9

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 5148 has 255% better value for money than i5-2400.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.33 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)0 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache6144 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155771
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-2400 2.53
+322%
Xeon 5148 0.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-2400 3866
+324%
Xeon 5148 912

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.53 0.60
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 40 Watt

i5-2400 has a 321.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon 5148, on the other hand, has 137.5% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-2400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon 5148 in performance tests.

Note that Core i5-2400 is a desktop processor while Xeon 5148 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-2400 and Xeon 5148, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-2400
Core i5-2400
Intel Xeon 5148
Xeon 5148

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3345 votes

Rate Core i5-2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 5148 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-2400 or Xeon 5148, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.