Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS vs i5-1034G1
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS outperforms i5-1034G1 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1105 | 310 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) | Hawk Point (2024) |
| Release date | 29 May 2019 (5 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.87 | 19.02 |
| Integrated graphics card | 3.11 | 18.32 |
| Recency | 29 May 2019 | 16 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
i5-1034G1 has 200% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, on the other hand, has a 224% higher aggregate performance score, 489.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-1034G1 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i5-1034G1 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
