Celeron J4025 vs Core i3-9100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-9100
2018
4 cores / 4 threads
4.27
+336%
Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads
0.98

Core i3-9100 outperforms Celeron J4025 by 336% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12732359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation9.780.69
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date1 September 2018 (5 years ago)4 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data
Current price$142 (1.2x MSRP)$587

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-9100 has 1317% better value for money than Celeron J4025.

Detailed Specifications

Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-no data
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth37.5 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory64 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hz4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-9100 4.27
+336%
Celeron J4025 0.98

Core i3-9100 outperforms Celeron J4025 by 336% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-9100 6610
+335%
Celeron J4025 1518

Core i3-9100 outperforms Celeron J4025 by 335% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-9100 1378
+299%
Celeron J4025 345

Core i3-9100 outperforms Celeron J4025 by 299% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-9100 3585
+546%
Celeron J4025 555

Core i3-9100 outperforms Celeron J4025 by 546% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 4.27 0.98
Integrated graphics card 3.08 0.86
Recency 1 September 2018 4 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

The Core i3-9100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-9100 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-9100
Core i3-9100
Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 738 votes

Rate Core i3-9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 96 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-9100 or Celeron J4025, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.