Celeron N5095 vs i3-8109U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-8109U
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
2.79
+4.5%

Core i3-8109U outperforms Celeron N5095 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17001725
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency9.0916.23
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-U (2018−2019)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date2 April 2018 (6 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size123 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1528FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM128 MBno data
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655Intel UHD Graphics
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency300 MHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-8109U 2.79
+4.5%
Celeron N5095 2.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-8109U 4263
+4.5%
Celeron N5095 4080

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i3-8109U 353
Celeron N5095 364
+3.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i3-8109U 139
+30.8%
Celeron N5095 106

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i3-8109U 1880
Celeron N5095 2028
+7.9%

Blender(-)

i3-8109U 1328
Celeron N5095 1547
+16.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i3-8109U 888
+36.5%
Celeron N5095 651

7-Zip Single

i3-8109U 3752
+21%
Celeron N5095 3100

7-Zip

i3-8109U 9489
Celeron N5095 11013
+16.1%

WebXPRT 3

i3-8109U 131
+4.8%
Celeron N5095 125

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.79 2.67
Integrated graphics card 4.49 5.57
Recency 2 April 2018 11 January 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

i3-8109U has a 4.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has 24.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095.

Be aware that Core i3-8109U is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-8109U and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-8109U
Core i3-8109U
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 43 votes

Rate Core i3-8109U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1438 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-8109U or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.