EPYC 7301 vs Core i3-540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-540
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
0.99

EPYC 7301 outperforms i3-540 by a whopping 879% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2377740
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.111.58
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$45$825
Current price$43 (1x MSRP)$1500 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7301 has 1336% better value for money than i3-540.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156TR4
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size16.38 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s170.671 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-540 0.99
EPYC 7301 9.69
+879%

EPYC 7301 outperforms Core i3-540 by 879% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-540 1535
EPYC 7301 14991
+877%

EPYC 7301 outperforms Core i3-540 by 877% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 9.69
Recency 7 January 2010 29 June 2017
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Cost $45 $825
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 170 Watt

The EPYC 7301 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-540 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-540 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7301 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-540 and EPYC 7301, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-540
Core i3-540
AMD EPYC 7301
EPYC 7301

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 607 votes

Rate Core i3-540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 22 votes

Rate EPYC 7301 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-540 or EPYC 7301, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.