Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs Core i3-4170T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4170T
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.08
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 280 Watt
21.66
+941%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms i3-4170T by a whopping 941% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1810226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.468.41
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameno dataMatisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 January 2015 (9 years ago)14 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$98 $1961

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has 1728% better value for money than i3-4170T.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB64 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4400-
Max video memory2 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz-
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+-
VGA+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz-
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz-
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12-
OpenGL4.3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

PCIe versionUp to 3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4170T 2.08
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 21.66
+941%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i3-4170T by 941% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-4170T 3215
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 33506
+942%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i3-4170T by 942% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-4170T 948
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 1660
+75.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i3-4170T by 75% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-4170T 1902
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 10797
+468%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX outperforms Core i3-4170T by 468% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.08 21.66
Recency 1 January 2015 14 July 2020
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4170T in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-4170T is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4170T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4170T
Core i3-4170T
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 39 votes

Rate Core i3-4170T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 28 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4170T or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.