EPYC 7601 vs Core i3-4170
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7601 outperforms i3-4170 by a whopping 841% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4170 and EPYC 7601 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1718 | 218 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.29 | 44.86 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | AMD EPYC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Naples (2017−2018) |
| Release date | no data | 20 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,200 |
| Current price | $80 | $200 (0x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 7601 has 1859% better value for money than i3-4170.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4170 and EPYC 7601 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 19200 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4170 and EPYC 7601 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4170 and EPYC 7601. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4170 and EPYC 7601 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4170 and EPYC 7601. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 TiB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 170.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4170 and EPYC 7601.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7601 outperforms Core i3-4170 by 841% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7601 outperforms Core i3-4170 by 840% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-4170 outperforms EPYC 7601 by 39% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
EPYC 7601 outperforms Core i3-4170 by 261% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.34 | 22.03 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 180 Watt |
i3-4170 has 233.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7601, on the other hand, has a 841.5% higher aggregate performance score.
The EPYC 7601 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4170 in performance tests.
Note that Core i3-4170 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7601 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4170 and EPYC 7601, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
