Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Core i3-4160
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms i3-4160 by a whopping 625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1737 | 367 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.49 | 11.68 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | ZEN+ (2018−2020) |
| Release date | 21 July 2014 (9 years ago) | 3 October 2018 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $133 | $649 |
| Current price | $33 (0.2x MSRP) | $682 (1.1x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 2284% better value for money than i3-4160.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1150 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| SIPP | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 93.867 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4400 | - |
| Max video memory | 2 GB | - |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video HD | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.15 GHz | - |
| InTru 3D | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | - |
| eDP | + | - |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DVI | + | - |
| VGA | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | - |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | - |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | - |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | - |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| PCIe version | Up to 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4160 by 625% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4160 by 624% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4160 by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-4160 by 256% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.27 | 16.46 |
| Recency | 21 July 2014 | 3 October 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 12 |
| Threads | 4 | 24 |
| Cost | $133 | $649 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 180 Watt |
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4160 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4160 and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
