Core i7-3517U vs Core i3-4130
Aggregate performance score
i3-4130 outperforms i7-3517U by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1791 | 2166 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.95 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 1 September 2013 (10 years ago) | 3 June 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $120 | no data |
| Current price | $35 (0.3x MSRP) | $611 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 177 mm2 | 118 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1150 | Intel BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| My WiFi | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | unknown Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4400 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i3-4130 outperforms Core i7-3517U by 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i3-4130 outperforms Core i7-3517U by 60% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-4130 outperforms Core i7-3517U by 118% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-4130 outperforms Core i7-3517U by 109% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.14 | 1.34 |
| Recency | 1 September 2013 | 3 June 2012 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 54 Watt | 17 Watt |
i3-4130 has a 59.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
i7-3517U, on the other hand, has 217.6% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-3517U in performance tests.
Note that Core i3-4130 is a desktop processor while Core i7-3517U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4130 and Core i7-3517U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
