E2-9010 vs Core i3-4030U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4030U
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.21
+70.4%

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4030U and E2-9010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22252582
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date14 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data
Current price$383 (1.4x MSRP)$561

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4030U and E2-9010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB2048 KB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4030U and E2-9010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1168FP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4030U and E2-9010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
AES-NI+1
FMAno dataFMA4
AVX+no data
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data-
PowerGatingno data-
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtectno data-
RAIDno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-4030U and E2-9010 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4030U and E2-9010 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0no data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4030U and E2-9010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1866
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4400AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
iGPU core countno data2
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4030U and E2-9010 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4030U and E2-9010 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43200x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3200x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4030U and E2-9010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.3no data
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4030U and E2-9010.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes128
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports4no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4030U 1.21
+70.4%
E2-9010 0.71

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 70% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-4030U 1873
+71.4%
E2-9010 1093

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 71% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-4030U 2808
+50.1%
E2-9010 1871

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 50% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-4030U 6285
+92.3%
E2-9010 3268

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 92% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-4030U 26.46
+40.4%
E2-9010 37.14

E2-9010 outperforms Core i3-4030U by 40% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-4030U 2
+79.6%
E2-9010 1

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 80% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-4030U 191
+110%
E2-9010 91

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 110% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-4030U 70
+32.1%
E2-9010 53

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 32% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-4030U 0.8
+25%
E2-9010 0.64

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 25% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-4030U 1.1
+46.7%
E2-9010 0.8

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 47% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-4030U 2344
+205%
E2-9010 769

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 205% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-4030U 12
+63.1%
E2-9010 7

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 63% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

i3-4030U 65
+65.3%
E2-9010 39

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 65% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-4030U 3767
+60.4%
E2-9010 2348

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 60% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-4030U 1790
+26.5%
E2-9010 1415

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 27% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

i3-4030U 4165
+36%
E2-9010 3062

Core i3-4030U outperforms E2-9010 by 36% in Geekbench 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.71
Recency 14 April 2014 1 June 2016
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

The Core i3-4030U is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-9010 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4030U and E2-9010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4030U
Core i3-4030U
AMD E2-9010
E2-9010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 184 votes

Rate Core i3-4030U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 27 votes

Rate E2-9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4030U or E2-9010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.