EPYC 7513 vs i3-4010U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4010U
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.04
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
37.32
+3488%

EPYC 7513 outperforms Core i3-4010U by a whopping 3488% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking242984
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.66
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD EPYC
Power efficiency6.5617.66
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date4 June 2013 (11 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$2,840

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.65 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm+
Die size118 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1168SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response+no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4400N/A
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43200x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3200x2000@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports4no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4010U 1.04
EPYC 7513 37.32
+3488%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4010U 1657
EPYC 7513 59285
+3478%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 37.32
Recency 4 June 2013 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

i3-4010U has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7513, on the other hand, has a 3488.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4010U in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-4010U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7513 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4010U and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4010U
Core i3-4010U
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 177 votes

Rate Core i3-4010U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4010U or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.