Core 2 Duo T6670 vs Core i3-4000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4000M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.12
+115%
Core 2 Duo T6670
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52

Core i3-4000M outperforms Core 2 Duo T6670 by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24032876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency2.861.41
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date4 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCPGA946PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600no data
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670.

PCIe version2no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4000M 1.12
+115%
Core 2 Duo T6670 0.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4000M 1785
+116%
Core 2 Duo T6670 827

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-4000M 719
+172%
Core 2 Duo T6670 264

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-4000M 1451
+252%
Core 2 Duo T6670 412

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-4000M 3581
+51.4%
Core 2 Duo T6670 2365

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-4000M 8042
+81.5%
Core 2 Duo T6670 4430

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-4000M 3098
+67.5%
Core 2 Duo T6670 1850

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-4000M 20
+160%
Core 2 Duo T6670 52.04

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.12 0.52
Recency 4 September 2013 1 January 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 35 Watt

i3-4000M has a 115.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T6670, on the other hand, has 5.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-4000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T6670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4000M and Core 2 Duo T6670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4000M
Core i3-4000M
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670
Core 2 Duo T6670

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 243 votes

Rate Core i3-4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 27 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4000M or Core 2 Duo T6670, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.