Xeon 6337P vs i3-380UM
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6337P outperforms Core i3-380UM by a whopping 2724% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3209 | 729 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 25.36 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.90 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (15 years ago) | 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $375 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i3-380UM and Xeon 6337P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.03 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 1.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 1 × 2.5 GT/s | 16 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 10 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 18 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 163 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-380UM and Xeon 6337P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380UM and Xeon 6337P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-380UM and Xeon 6337P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380UM and Xeon 6337P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380UM and Xeon 6337P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 12.799 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors | N/A |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 500 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-380UM and Xeon 6337P integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380UM and Xeon 6337P.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.42 | 11.86 |
| Recency | 1 October 2010 | 24 February 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 80 Watt |
i3-380UM has 344.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6337P, on the other hand, has a 2723.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6337P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-380UM in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i3-380UM is a notebook processor while Xeon 6337P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
