Processor N200 vs i3-380UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-380UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.47
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56
+232%

Processor N200 outperforms Core i3-380UM by a whopping 232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-380UM and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29262119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency2.4624.48
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

Core i3-380UM and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.33 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache3 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-380UM and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380UM and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-380UM and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380UM and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380UM and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-380UM and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380UM and Processor N200.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes169

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-380UM 0.47
Processor N200 1.56
+232%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-380UM 1502
Processor N200 3937
+162%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-380UM 3471
Processor N200 7549
+117%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-380UM 1463
Processor N200 3902
+167%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-380UM 40.53
Processor N200 25.99
+55.9%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-380UM 1
Processor N200 3
+146%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 1.56
Integrated graphics card 0.77 3.29
Recency 1 October 2010 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N200 has a 231.9% higher aggregate performance score, 327.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-380UM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-380UM and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-380UM
Core i3-380UM
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 8 votes

Rate Core i3-380UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 147 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-380UM or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.