Xeon W-11955M vs i3-380M

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-380M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.75
Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.21
+1795%

Xeon W-11955M outperforms Core i3-380M by a whopping 1795% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2646506
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.30
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency2.0338.42
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Tiger Lake-H (2021)
Release date26 October 2010 (14 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49$623

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.53 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm SuperFin
Die size81+114 mm2190 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCBGA1787
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s51.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHz1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-380M 0.75
Xeon W-11955M 14.21
+1795%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-380M 1199
Xeon W-11955M 22579
+1783%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-380M 331
Xeon W-11955M 2051
+520%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-380M 648
Xeon W-11955M 8864
+1268%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 14.21
Integrated graphics card 0.77 5.58
Recency 26 October 2010 11 May 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

Xeon W-11955M has a 1794.7% higher aggregate performance score, 624.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-11955M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-380M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-380M is a notebook processor while Xeon W-11955M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-380M and Xeon W-11955M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-380M
Core i3-380M
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 461 vote

Rate Core i3-380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 23 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-380M or Xeon W-11955M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.