Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs i3-370M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-370M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.75
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.29
+472%

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms i3-370M by a whopping 472% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26331342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date22 June 2010 (14 years ago)8 January 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$245no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1820
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA988AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-370M 0.75
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4.29
+472%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-370M 1155
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6638
+475%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-370M 320
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 875
+173%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-370M 645
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 2566
+298%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-370M 2690
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 4349
+61.7%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-370M 6204
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 14336
+131%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-370M 2578
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 5635
+119%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-370M 21.2
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 12.36
+71.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-370M 2
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 6
+207%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 4.29
Recency 22 June 2010 8 January 2018
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U has a 472% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-370M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-370M and Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-370M
Core i3-370M
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 499 votes

Rate Core i3-370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 114 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-370M or Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.