Pentium B960 vs Core i3-330E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-330E
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.81
+28.6%

i3-330E outperforms Pentium B960 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-330E and Pentium B960 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25002677
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Pentium
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)2 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$177$134
Current price$353 (2x MSRP)$19.33 (0.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-330E and Pentium B960 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus support1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA,105 °C for BGA85 °C
Number of transistors382 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-330E and Pentium B960 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1288FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium B960. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI--
FMA++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-330E and Pentium B960 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium B960 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium B960. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR3
Maximum memory size8.79 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency667 MHz1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330E and Pentium B960 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330E and Pentium B960.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-330E 0.81
+28.6%
Pentium B960 0.63

Core i3-330E outperforms Pentium B960 by 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-330E 1260
+30.3%
Pentium B960 967

Core i3-330E outperforms Pentium B960 by 30% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 0.63
Recency 7 January 2010 2 October 2011
Threads 4 2
Cost $177 $134

The Core i3-330E is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium B960 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-330E and Pentium B960, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-330E
Core i3-330E
Intel Pentium B960
Pentium B960

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Core i3-330E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 442 votes

Rate Pentium B960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-330E or Pentium B960, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.