Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i3-3250T

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1954	174
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.22	63.08
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	no data	AMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codename	no data	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020)
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	5 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$549
Current price	$80	$351 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 5900X has 2741% better value for money than i3-3250T.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	4	24
Base clock speed	3 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	no data	4.8 GHz
L1 cache	no data	64K (per core)
L2 cache	no data	512K (per core)
L3 cache	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache	64 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Die size	no data	2x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperature	65 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	95 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	AM4
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
My WiFi	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	no data
FDI	+	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	-	no data
Identity Protection	+	no data
Anti-Theft	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	32 GB	128 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics 2500	-
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	-
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	-
InTru 3D	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

3

-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X.

PCIe version

2.0

4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i3-3250T by 1381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.71	25.32
Recency	1 April 2013	5 November 2020
Physical cores	2	12
Threads	4	24
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	105 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3250T and Ryzen 9 5900X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---