i7-12700KF vs i3-3217UE

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3217UE
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.89
Core i7-12700KF
2021
12 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
22.43
+2420%

Core i7-12700KF outperforms Core i3-3217UE by a whopping 2420% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2551240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.42
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Power efficiency4.7716.36
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
Release date1 August 2012 (12 years ago)27 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$384

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data8 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size118 mm2215.25 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1023FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.805 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4000no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3217UE 0.89
i7-12700KF 22.43
+2420%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3217UE 1362
i7-12700KF 34331
+2421%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 22.43
Recency 1 August 2012 27 October 2021
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 125 Watt

i3-3217UE has 635.3% lower power consumption.

i7-12700KF, on the other hand, has a 2420.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 500% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

The Core i7-12700KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3217UE in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-3217UE is a notebook processor while Core i7-12700KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217UE and Core i7-12700KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3217UE
Core i3-3217UE
Intel Core i7-12700KF
Core i7-12700KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i3-3217UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1121 vote

Rate Core i7-12700KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3217UE or Core i7-12700KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.