A4-4300M vs i3-3210

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3210
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.46
+125%

Core i3-3210 outperforms A4-4300M by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22052761
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.421.69
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache3072 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3unknown
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2500AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3210 1.46
+125%
A4-4300M 0.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3210 2227
+123%
A4-4300M 1000

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3210 506
+71.5%
A4-4300M 295

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3210 1028
+164%
A4-4300M 390

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 0.65
Integrated graphics card 0.69 0.80
Recency 1 January 2013 15 May 2012
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

i3-3210 has a 124.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, 100% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

A4-4300M, on the other hand, has 15.9% faster integrated GPU, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-3210 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4300M in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-3210 is a desktop processor while A4-4300M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3210 and A4-4300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3210
Core i3-3210
AMD A4-4300M
A4-4300M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 263 votes

Rate Core i3-3210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 118 votes

Rate A4-4300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3210 or A4-4300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.