Celeron J3455 vs i3-3210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3210
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.46
Celeron J3455
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.47
+0.7%

Celeron J3455 outperforms Core i3-3210 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22032184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.140.16
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.4213.40
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$120$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J3455 has 14% better value for money than i3-3210.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache3072 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
FDI+no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key-+
Identity Protection++
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2500Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3210 1.46
Celeron J3455 1.47
+0.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3210 2227
Celeron J3455 2256
+1.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3210 506
+97.7%
Celeron J3455 256

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3210 1028
+33.2%
Celeron J3455 772

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 1.47
Integrated graphics card 0.69 0.77
Recency 1 January 2013 30 August 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron J3455 has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, 11.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 450% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3210 and Celeron J3455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3210
Core i3-3210
Intel Celeron J3455
Celeron J3455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 263 votes

Rate Core i3-3210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 199 votes

Rate Celeron J3455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3210 or Celeron J3455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.