Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs i3-2393M
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 746 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 18.31 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 14 August 2011 (14 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $50 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 149 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 624 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | Socket G2 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2393M and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.61 | 16.43 |
| Recency | 14 August 2011 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 has 2593.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core i3-2393M and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
