Ryzen 7 4800U vs i3-2310M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2310M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.77
Ryzen 7 4800U
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
10.51
+1265%

Ryzen 7 4800U outperforms Core i3-2310M by a whopping 1265% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2631737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency2.0839.79
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier2118
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size149 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)105 °C
Number of transistors624 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2310M 0.77
Ryzen 7 4800U 10.51
+1265%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2310M 1223
Ryzen 7 4800U 16687
+1264%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-2310M 324
Ryzen 7 4800U 1400
+332%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-2310M 647
Ryzen 7 4800U 5668
+776%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-2310M 2762
Ryzen 7 4800U 5690
+106%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-2310M 6191
Ryzen 7 4800U 33649
+444%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-2310M 2517
Ryzen 7 4800U 10227
+306%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-2310M 25.8
Ryzen 7 4800U 3.63
+611%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-2310M 2
Ryzen 7 4800U 18
+788%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i3-2310M 0.84
Ryzen 7 4800U 2.15
+156%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 10.51
Integrated graphics card 0.66 9.04
Recency 1 February 2011 6 January 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Ryzen 7 4800U has a 1264.9% higher aggregate performance score, 1269.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 4800U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2310M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2310M and Ryzen 7 4800U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2310M
Core i3-2310M
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U
Ryzen 7 4800U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 572 votes

Rate Core i3-2310M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 223 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 4800U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2310M or Ryzen 7 4800U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.