V-Series V120 vs i3-2310E
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-2310E outperforms V-Series V120 by a whopping 330% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-2310E and V-Series V120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2380 | 3146 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD V-Series |
Power efficiency | 3.14 | 1.02 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
Release date | 1 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-2310E and V-Series V120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 3200 MHz |
Multiplier | 21 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 149 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 624 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-2310E and V-Series V120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | Intel BGA1023 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2310E and V-Series V120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
VirusProtect | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2310E and V-Series V120 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2310E and V-Series V120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.16 | 0.27 |
Recency | 1 February 2011 | 12 May 2010 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
i3-2310E has a 329.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
V-Series V120, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-2310E is our recommended choice as it beats the V-Series V120 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2310E and V-Series V120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.