Celeron 600 vs i3-1115G4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1460not rated
Place by popularity55not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency12.90no data
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)Timna
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz0.6 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)32 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)128 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin180 nm
Die sizeno data129 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449370S
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel i752
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-1115G4 6053
+4018%
Celeron 600 147

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 10 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 30 Watt

i3-1115G4 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core i3-1115G4 is a notebook processor while Celeron 600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron 600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-1115G4
Core i3-1115G4
Intel Celeron 600
Celeron 600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5322 votes

Rate Core i3-1115G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-1115G4 or Celeron 600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.