EPYC 7413 vs i3-10105F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-10105F
2021
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.68
EPYC 7413
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
31.73
+459%

EPYC 7413 outperforms Core i3-10105F by a whopping 459% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1132131
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.08
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.2416.61
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data26.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-10105F 5.68
EPYC 7413 31.73
+459%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8994
EPYC 7413 50223
+458%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-10105F 1473
EPYC 7413 1538
+4.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-10105F 4525
EPYC 7413 12804
+183%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.68 31.73
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

i3-10105F has 176.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7413, on the other hand, has a 458.6% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10105F in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-10105F is a desktop processor while EPYC 7413 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3583 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.