Athlon 64 3200+ vs i3-10105F

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1132not rated
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.24no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake-R (2021)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$150

Detailed specifications

Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200754
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-10105F 8994
+2849%
Athlon 64 3200+ 305

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 89 Watt

i3-10105F has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10105F and Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3584 votes

Rate Core i3-10105F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 91 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-10105F or Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.