Ultra X9 378H vs i3-10100F

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1500not rated
Place by popularity23not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.03no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Panther Lake
Power efficiency3.22no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020−2025)Panther Lake (2026)
Release date12 October 2020 (5 years ago)5 April 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core i3-10100F and Core Ultra X9 378H: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB12.5 MB
L3 cache6 MB18 MB
Chip lithography14 nm2 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-10100F and Core Ultra X9 378H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200FCBGA2540
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10100F and Core Ultra X9 378H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Core i3-10100F and Core Ultra X9 378H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10100F and Core Ultra X9 378H are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10100F and Core Ultra X9 378H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10100F and Core Ultra X9 378H.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2020 5 April 2026
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 2 nm

Ultra X9 378H has an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core i3-10100F and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-10100F is a desktop processor while Core Ultra X9 378H is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8697 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra X9 378H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-10100F and Core Ultra X9 378H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.