Xeon W-3275M vs Core i3-10100
Aggregated performance score
Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i3-10100 by a whopping 353% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1054 | 168 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 22.50 | 2.42 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon W |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake-S (2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $130 | $7,453 |
| Current price | $133 (1x MSRP) | $9030 (1.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-10100 has 830% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 1.75 MB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 38.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 76 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| SIPP | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | + |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
Security technologies
Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | no data |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | no data |
| Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2160@30Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i3-10100 by 353% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i3-10100 by 353% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-10100 outperforms Xeon W-3275M by 19% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i3-10100 by 178% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.60 | 25.34 |
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 3 June 2019 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 28 |
| Threads | 8 | 56 |
| Cost | $130 | $7453 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 205 Watt |
The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-10100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i3-10100 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-10100 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
