Celeron N3350 vs Ultra X7 358H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra X7 358H
16 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
18.47
+2832%

Core Ultra X7 358H outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 2832% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3953031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency31.204.43
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenamePanther Lake (2026)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release dateno data30 August 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$24

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores4no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores4no data
Threads162
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplierno data11
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache18 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithographyno data14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA2540FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR5X-9600DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size96 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ B390 GPUIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency2.5 GHz650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX 12 Ultimate+
OpenGL4.6+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes126
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra X7 358H 18.47
+2832%
Celeron N3350 0.63

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra X7 358H 32363
+2810%
Samples: 12
Celeron N3350 1112
Samples: 1160

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra X7 358H 3039
+3475%
Celeron N3350 85

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.47 0.63
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

Ultra X7 358H has a 2831.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron N3350, on the other hand, has 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N3350 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
Core Ultra X7 358H
Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra X7 358H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 1059 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra X7 358H and Celeron N3350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.