Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Ultra 9 295HX
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Gorgon Point |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 295HX and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 295HX and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 54 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 24 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 54 Watt |
Ultra 9 295HX has 100% more physical cores.
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475, on the other hand, has 1.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
