Ultra 9 295HX vs Celeron 6205
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Tiger Lake | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake U (2020) | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) |
| Release date | 1 September 2020 (5 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 295HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 2/2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 295HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA1499 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Core Ultra 9 295HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
| Threads | 2 | 24 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron 6205 has 266.7% lower power consumption.
Ultra 9 295HX, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 6205 and Intel Core Ultra 9 295HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
