Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 151 | 129 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
| Power efficiency | 26.18 | 5.40 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX Refresh (2026) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 17 March 2026 (less than a year ago) | 25 November 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Performance-cores | 8 | no data |
| Efficient-cores | 16 | no data |
| Threads | 24 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 8 × 16 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 37 |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) | 128 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | 19,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | TR4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-6400 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 102.403 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Graphics | - |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 2 GHz | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL) | - |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840 x 2400 @ 120Hz | - |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | - |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 35.02 | 36.74 |
| Recency | 17 March 2026 | 25 November 2019 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 32 |
| Threads | 24 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 280 Watt |
Ultra 9 290HX Plus has an age advantage of 6 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 409% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, on the other hand, has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, and 33% more physical cores and 167% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Be aware that Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
