EPYC Embedded 8224P vs Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus outperforms EPYC Embedded 8224P by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 130 | 240 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.36 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-HX Refresh (2026) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 17 March 2026 (less than a year ago) | 18 September 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC Embedded 8224P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.55 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | 2x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 75 °C |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | 17,750 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC Embedded 8224P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 2114 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 160 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC Embedded 8224P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC Embedded 8224P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC Embedded 8224P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC Embedded 8224P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 96 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 36.19 | 28.24 |
| Recency | 17 March 2026 | 18 September 2023 |
| Threads | 24 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 160 Watt |
Ultra 9 290HX Plus has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 67% more advanced lithography process, and 191% lower power consumption.
EPYC Embedded 8224P, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.
The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P in performance tests.
Be aware that Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8224P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
