Ultra 7 256V vs Ultra 9 288V

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.56
+0.3%

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking623619
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency39.5069.92
Architecture codenameLunar Lake (2024)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate37 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 2833Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc 140VArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 9 288V 12.52
Ultra 7 256V 12.56
+0.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 9 288V 19895
Ultra 7 256V 19947
+0.3%

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 9 288V 1654
Ultra 7 256V 1700
+2.8%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 9 288V 342
+20%
Ultra 7 256V 285

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 288V 11069
+1.1%
Ultra 7 256V 10952

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.52 12.56
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 256V has a 0.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 76.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 288V and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 288V or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.