Ultra 7 255H vs Ultra 9 285K

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
42.38
+135%
Core Ultra 7 255H
2025
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
18.02

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Core Ultra 7 255H by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking60343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation74.49no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency32.3114.93
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)no data
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-cores86
Efficient-cores168
Low Power Efficient-coresno data2
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate250 MHzno data
L1 cache192 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache3 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache36 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography3 nmno data
Die size243 mm2no data
Number of transistors17,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1851FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNNOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size192 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsIntel® Arc™ 140T GPU
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency2 GHz2.25 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4K @ 60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort8K @ 60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes2028
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 9 285K 42.38
+135%
Ultra 7 255H 18.02

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 9 285K 67871
+135%
Ultra 7 255H 28867

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.38 18.02
Recency 24 October 2024 1 January 2025
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 115 Watt

Ultra 9 285K has a 135.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ultra 7 255H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 255H in performance tests.

Note that Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 7 255H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285K and Core Ultra 7 255H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Core Ultra 7 255H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 264 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 255H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285K or Core Ultra 7 255H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.