Ryzen 7 7745HX vs Ultra 9 285H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 285H
2025, $651
16 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.44
+5.5%

Core Ultra 9 285H outperforms Ryzen 7 7745HX by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking352378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.45no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency46.3235.93
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerTSMCTSMC
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)Dragon Range (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$651no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache192 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nmCCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA2049FL1
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.35 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2428

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 285H 19.44
+5.5%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 18.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 285H 34286
+5.5%
Samples: 829
Ryzen 7 7745HX 32506
Samples: 300

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ultra 9 285H 2607
Ryzen 7 7745HX 2622
+0.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ultra 9 285H 14815
+15.9%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 12782

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ultra 9 285H 11459
+43.1%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 8006

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ultra 9 285H 74797
+36.6%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 54762

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ultra 9 285H 3.38
Ryzen 7 7745HX 2.28
+48.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 9 285H 3137
+5.1%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 2986

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 9 285H 311
+5.6%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 295

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ultra 9 285H 9.5
Ryzen 7 7745HX 16.4
+72.6%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ultra 9 285H 181
+4.2%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 173

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ultra 9 285H 360
+0.3%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 359

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15435
+19.5%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 12920

7-Zip Single

Ultra 9 285H 6069
Ryzen 7 7745HX 7260
+19.6%

7-Zip

Ultra 9 285H 56987
Ryzen 7 7745HX 79413
+39.4%

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 9 285H 1993
Ryzen 7 7745HX 2103
+5.5%

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 9 285H 289
+2.6%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 282

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 9 285H 379
+38.1%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 275

Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 16369
+10.4%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 14825

Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core

Ultra 9 285H 2847
+1.4%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 2807

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 9 285H 15330
+3.4%
Ryzen 7 7745HX 14825

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.44 18.43
Recency 13 January 2025 4 January 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt

Ultra 9 285H has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Core Ultra 9 285H and AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Core Ultra 9 285H
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
Ryzen 7 7745HX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 116 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 273 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7745HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 7745HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.