Embedded G-Series T56N vs Ultra 9 285

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Embedded G-Series
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Bobcat
Release dateJanuary 2025no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.65 GHz
Boost clock speed5.6 GHz1.82 GHz
Multiplierno data16.5
L1 cache112 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache3 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache36 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nm40 nm
Die size243 mm275 mm2
Number of transistors17,800 million451 Million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket1851no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 Depends on motherboardno data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data10.67 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardArc Xe2 Graphics 64EUAMD Radeon HD 6320

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 24 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 18 Watt

Ultra 9 285 has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.

Embedded G-Series T56N, on the other hand, has 594.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core Ultra 9 285 is a desktop processor while Embedded G-Series T56N is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 285
Core Ultra 9 285
AMD Embedded G-Series T56N
Embedded G-Series T56N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 74 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Embedded G-Series T56N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 9 285 or Embedded G-Series T56N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.