Embedded G-Series T56E vs Ultra 9 285
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Embedded G-Series |
| Architecture codename | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Bobcat |
| Release date | January 2025 | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.65 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.6 GHz | 1.82 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 16.5 |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 36 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 243 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 17,800 million | 451 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1851 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 Depends on motherboard | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 10.67 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU | AMD Radeon HD 6250 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 24 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 18 Watt |
Ultra 9 285 has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.
Embedded G-Series T56E, on the other hand, has 594.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core Ultra 9 285 is a desktop processor while Embedded G-Series T56E is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 9 285 and Embedded G-Series T56E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
