EPYC 4345P vs Ultra 9 275HX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 9 275HX
2025
24 cores / 24 threads, 55 Watt
34.76
+48.4%
EPYC 4345P
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
23.43

Core Ultra 9 275HX outperforms EPYC 4345P by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking132262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data60.51
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency60.9634.77
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-HX (2025)Grado (2025)
Release date1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)13 May 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-cores8no data
Efficient-cores16no data
Threads2416
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5.4 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache40 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache36 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data8,315 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA2114AM5
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.9 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2424

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 9 275HX 34.76
+48.4%
EPYC 4345P 23.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 9 275HX 55887
+48.4%
EPYC 4345P 37671

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.76 23.43
Recency 1 January 2025 13 May 2025
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 9 275HX has a 48.4% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4345P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 4345P in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 9 275HX is a notebook processor while EPYC 4345P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Core Ultra 9 275HX
AMD EPYC 4345P
EPYC 4345P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 95 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 275HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4345P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 9 275HX and EPYC 4345P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.