Celeron 1017U vs Ultra 7 366H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 366H
2026
16 cores / 16 threads, 25 Watt
19.67
+2135%

Core Ultra 7 366H outperforms Celeron 1017U by a whopping 2135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4212933
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency32.472.14
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenamePanther Lake (2026)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)1 July 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Performance-cores4no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores4no data
Threads162
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache18 MB2 MB
Chip lithography1.8 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA2540FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR5X-8533, DDR5-7200DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.5 GHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX 12 Ultimateno data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.02.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ultra 7 366H 19.67
+2135%
Celeron 1017U 0.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ultra 7 366H 33669
+2133%
Samples: 268
Celeron 1017U 1508
Samples: 186

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.67 0.88
Recency 5 January 2026 1 July 2013
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 1 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 366H has a 2135% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 1017U, on the other hand, has 47% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 1017U in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 19 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 366H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 74 votes

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 366H and Celeron 1017U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.