Pentium M 780 vs Ultra 7 265U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 265U
2025
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
10.21
+4541%

Core Ultra 7 265U outperforms Pentium M 780 by a whopping 4541% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9203487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataPentium M
Power efficiency28.740.34
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-U (2025)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date1 January 2025 (1 year ago)25 July 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Performance-cores2no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads141
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache12 MB0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data87 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V-1.404V

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCBGA2049PPGA478, H-PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR2
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.21 0.22
Recency 1 January 2025 25 July 2005
Physical cores 12 1
Threads 14 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 27 Watt

Ultra 7 265U has a 4540.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 780 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
Core Ultra 7 265U
Intel Pentium M 780
Pentium M 780

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 25 votes

Rate Pentium M 780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 265U and Pentium M 780, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.