Turion 64 MK-38 vs Ultra 7 255H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 255H
2025
16 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
17.41
+8605%

Core Ultra 7 255H outperforms Turion 64 MK-38 by a whopping 8605% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4063456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.13no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataTurion 64
Power efficiency26.460.27
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-H (2025)Richmond
Release date1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$514no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Performance-cores6no data
Efficient-cores8no data
Low Power Efficient-cores2no data
Threads161
Base clock speed4.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L3 cache24 MBno data
Chip lithography5 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFCBGA2049no data
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-
Supported AI Software FrameworksOpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-6400no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® Arc™ 140T GPUno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency2.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS)7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 FRL)no data
Max resolution over eDP3840 x 2400 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.2no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes28no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.41 0.20
Physical cores 16 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 31 Watt

Ultra 7 255H has a 8605% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 10.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 MK-38 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Core Ultra 7 255H
AMD Turion 64 MK-38
Turion 64 MK-38

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 101 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 255H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate Turion 64 MK-38 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core Ultra 7 255H and Turion 64 MK-38, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.