Pentium M 718 vs Ultra 7 155H
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Pentium M 718 by a whopping 14291% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 424 | 3357 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Meteor Lake-H | Pentium M |
| Power efficiency | 53.50 | 1.04 |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $503 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 22 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | Intel 4 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 96 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® Arc™ graphics | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 2.25 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.2 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
| PCI support | 5.0 and 4.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.83 | 0.11 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 22 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 10 Watt |
Ultra 7 155H has a 14290.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.
Pentium M 718, on the other hand, has 180% lower power consumption.
The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 718 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Pentium M 718, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
