Celeron J1800 vs Ultra 7 155H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 155H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
15.81
+4292%
Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36

Core Ultra 7 155H outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 4292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4333050
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Celeron
Power efficiency53.403.40
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$503$72

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads222
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz2.58 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache24 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography7 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 2049FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data792 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes84

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 155H 15.81
+4292%
Celeron J1800 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 155H 25119
+4276%
Celeron J1800 574

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.81 0.36
Integrated graphics card 18.48 0.77
Recency 14 December 2023 1 November 2013
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 22 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 10 Watt

Ultra 7 155H has a 4291.7% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has 180% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 155H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 155H and Celeron J1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 563 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 155H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 539 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 155H or Celeron J1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.